Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People ex rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 10, 1930No. 12,515Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Butleb

After the Attorney General filed his petition, Kelley personally, and without counsel, entered his appearance in this court and filed his answer, in which he stated that *92lie desired not to join issue; submitted that he has not been guilty of moral turpitude, and that he has not wilfully violated the canons of ethics of the legal profession; called attention to his inexperience and lack of time to reflect and to choose the proper course; and asked the court to exercise leniency. The Attorney General thereupon asked judgment on the pleadings, and the matter was submitted without brief or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Eli v. BensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API