Legal Opinion
Farmers National Bank v. Wickham Pipeline Construction
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1988No. 17090PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Justice.
Third party plaintiffs, Scona, Inc., and Cook, Newcomb and Stolworthy, doing business as CNS, filed a complaint for indemnification against third party defendant, Beall Pipe, Inc. Upon Beall’s motion for summary judgment, the third party complaint was dismissed with prejudice because the statute of limitations under I.C. § 28-2-725 had run. Appellants appeal from the summary judgment order. We affirm.
I
About July 3, 1978, Scona, Inc. (Scona), entered into a contract with the United States for the construction of a certain project known as the “Deep Creek Farm Irrigation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Minyard v. Curtis Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1967
- Parker v. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woollen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Perry v. Pioneer Wholesale Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1984
- Mickelsen v. City of RexburgIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- Colorado National Bank of Denver v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Willmar v. Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Central Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Wood River v. Geer-Melkus Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Superior, Inc. v. Behlen Mfg. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.