Legal Opinion
Davis v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 25, 1989No. Nos. 88-5, 88-113PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Petitioners Delores Davis and Ivy Bovey, both non-residents of the District of Columbia, were injured in separate accidents in the District caused by drivers who were without available insurance coverage.1 They filed claims for personal injury protection (PIP) benefits pursuant to the Compulsory No-Fault Motor Vehicle Insurance Act of 1982, D.C. Law 4-155, D.C.Code § 35-2101 et seq. (1985 Supp.).2 The District’s Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (the agency) denied the claims in conformity with former § 35-2106(e)(2), which provided that
[n]o victim is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- L.H. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- SARAH LANDISE v. THOMAS MAURO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016