Legal Opinion

People v. Session

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1974PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRabin, J.

On this appeal from the denial of coram nobis relief, we are called upon to consider whether allegations contained in defendant Josh Session’s petition and supporting affidavits are sufficient to require a hearing. Session submitted affidavits from three codefendants stating that an Assistant District Attorney had threatened them with increased charges if they testified in Session’s behalf. However, the affidavits did not contain the nature of any testimony the codefendants could offer, or how it could be of value to Session.

This showing is not sufficient to entitle Session to a hearing on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RichettiNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. People v. WhiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. FriedgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. The People v. Gary WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. People v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API