Maniscalco v. TAC Americas Comprehensive Healthcare Plan
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MCMAHON, District Judge.
Thomas and Alexandra Maniscalco filed this action against TAC Americas, Inc. Comprehensive Healthcare Plan (the “Plan”) and TAC Americas, Inc. (“TAC”) to recover medical benefits and attorneys’ fees wider the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001-1461 (West 2003), specifically § 1132(a)(1)(B), (a)(3), and (g). TAC moves to dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction, and, alternatively moves for summary judgment based on the Plaintiffs’ failure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Natalia Makarova v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Luckett v. BureCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Amato v. BernardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Joseph J. Peterson v. Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Kennedy v. Empire Blue Cross And Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.