Cahill v. McGrath
Appellate Court of Illinois
Transcript, from a justice of the peace.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman
The entry in the docket of the justice has none of the elements of a confession of judgment. For a defendant to acknowledge before a justice of the peace, or other court, that he is indebted to the plaintiff in a certain sum, is not to confess or consent to judgment.
A judgment is always the result of a decision by a court, and is entered against a party nolens volens, or because he consents to—confesses—judgment.
There is a manifest and wide distinction between confessing an indebtedness and confessing judgment. Goddard v. Fischer, 23 Ill. App. 365; Campbell v. Randolph, 13 Ill. 313; Elliott…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Campbell v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
- Elliott v. DaiberIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
- Goddard v. FischerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887