Legal Opinion

Cahill v. McGrath

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1896Published

Transcript, from a justice of the peace.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

The entry in the docket of the justice has none of the elements of a confession of judgment. For a defendant to acknowledge before a justice of the peace, or other court, that he is indebted to the plaintiff in a certain sum, is not to confess or consent to judgment.

A judgment is always the result of a decision by a court, and is entered against a party nolens volens, or because he consents to—confesses—judgment.

There is a manifest and wide distinction between confessing an indebtedness and confessing judgment. Goddard v. Fischer, 23 Ill. App. 365; Campbell v. Randolph, 13 Ill. 313; Elliott…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Elliott v. DaiberIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Goddard v. FischerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API