Legal Opinion

State v. Boyd

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 9, 1992No. Nos. 91-3348 to 91-3353, 91-3355 to 91-3357 and 91-3359 to 91-3366PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state seeks to have this court exercise jurisdiction pursuant to rule 9.160, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. District courts may only exercise jurisdiction pursuant to that rule if the order being challenged is otherwise appealable to the circuit court pursuant to rule 9.140(c), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See rule 9.030(b)(4)(B), Fla.R.App.P. The order of the county court which is being appealed held that the state could not rely on compliance with Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services’ rules to supplant the traditional predicate for the introduction of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. KepkeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BrighamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API