Legal Opinion

Bigelow Et Ux. v. Dunphe

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 2, 1940PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

According to the briefs, the point to be borne in mind, as we examine the facts and the applicable principles of law, is the validity of a mortgage executed by a free dealer, without her husband joining, encumbering property standing in her name and occupied by' the woman, her husband and her children. In stating the question appellants refer to the mortgagor as the head of the family and to the property as a homestead while appellee gives her no such designation and describes the land as “separate property * * * used at the time as the home.”

To answer the respective parties we must determine…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas Land & Loan Co. v. BlalockTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Lynn v. SentelIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Jones v. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Cropper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Butterworth v. CaggianoSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Public Health Tr. of Dade Cty. v. LopezSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  3. Reed v. FainSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  4. Vandiver v. VincentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  5. In Re EhnleUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API