Legal Opinion

Graziano v. Graziano

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 7, 1981No. 142-80PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

After a contested hearing the plaintiff obtained a divorce in Rutland Superior Court on the ground that the parties had lived separate and apart for six consecutive months, with the resumption of marital relations not reasonably probable. 15 V.S.A. § 551. In ordering a disposition of the property pursuant to 15 V.S.A. § 751, the trial court awarded about 60 % of the property to the plaintiff, and about 40% to the defendant. The plaintiff appeals, asserting that the trial court abused its discretion concerning this division in that the plaintiff should have been awarded all of the equity in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PalmerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  2. Sweeney v. SweeneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. Peisch v. PeischSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  4. Whitcomb v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Victor v. VictorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Costello v. CostelloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. Baird v. BairdSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API