Naito v. Naito
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
In 1987, Midori Naito (wife) was appointed conservator of the estate of Hide Naito, her husband. Hide’s sons from a prior marriage, Samuel and William Naito (sons), opposed wife’s appointment and, in January, 1988, filed a petition seeking her removal. They alleged that she had engaged in acts of self dealing whereby she had removed substantial assets from the estate. They also requested attorney fees payable from the estate.
The trial court granted sons’ petition, removed wife and appointed Samuel and respondent Schwab to serve as co-conservators. The court, however, denied them attorney…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kay v. David Douglas School District No. 40Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- McEwen v. McEwenOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Hall v. PierceOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Naito v. NaitoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Derkatsch v. Thorp, Purdy, Jewett, Urness & Wilkinson, P. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Alongi v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995