Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from, Third Judicial District, Custer County. An objection by the defendant to the introduction of any testimony under the indictment was sustained by Liddell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Witt, J.

The defendant was indicted in the District Court of Custer County, May 13, 1889, for the crime of rape. The charging portion of the indictment is as follows: “ That E. J. Williams, with force and arms, in and upon one Mary Williams, then and there being a female child under the age of fifteen years, to wit, of the age of thirteen years, feloniously, violently, and unlawfully did make an assault, and her, the said Mary Williams, then and there feloniously did ravish, and carnally know, contrary to the form of the statute,” etc. The law of the then Territory on which the indictment was found…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. State v. RobeyNevada Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Territory v. BurnsMontana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Territory v. JasparMontana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Higgins v. Brown, JudgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. State v. WoodMontana Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. MilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API