Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. State Farm Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 1, 1988No. Docket 95838, 96929PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtP. Nicolich, J.

This consolidated appeal arises from two complaints filed against State Farm Insurance Company and defendants William Harb and Harb Insurance Agency, Inc., by plaintiffs Carol and Timothy Hall and plaintiff Nancy McCarthy. In their complaints, the plaintiffs alleged that plaintiffs Carol Hall and Nancy McCarthy, while employed at Harb Insurance Agency, Inc. (hia), were sexually harassed by William Harb, the proprietor of hia, in violation of the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq. hia sold State Farm insurance exclusively. State Farm filed motions for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. LANGLOIS v. McDONALD’S RESTAURANTS OF MICHIGAN, INCMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Parham v. Preferred Risk Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bleam v. Sterling InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bambino v. DunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Radtke v. EverettMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Chambers v. Trettco, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Sharon Hartleip, Cross-Appellee v. McNeilab Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Ashker v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Sheridan v. Forest Hills Public SchoolsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API