Legal Opinion

In Re Hardesty

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 2002No. COA01-825PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

Latasha Hardesty, respondent, appeals from orders which terminated her parental rights and denied visitation. For the reasons discussed herein, we reverse the trial court’s termination order as to her son, Ladarrius Laquan Hardesty, but affirm as to DeAndrea Monique Hardesty and Shakeena Lakese Hudson.

Among the assignments of error, Hardesty argues the petition to terminate her parental rights to Ladarrius, born 20 April 1999, insufficiently alleged facts upon which the trial court could base a determination. We agree.

Petitioner, the Craven County Department of Social Services…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of MontgomerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Matter of SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. In Re SwisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In Re BakerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. In re C.W.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. In re A.D.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. In re H.L.A.D.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. In re M.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API