Legal Opinion
Family Construction v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 1984No. Nos. 83-805, 83-948PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAIR, Associate Judge, Retired.
Brought into question by this petition for review is an order of the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (respondent) voiding two installment sales contracts made by petitioner in the course of its business as a home improvement contractor. Petitioner contends that respondent erred (1) in making applicable to the two contracts, Consumer Retail Credit Regulation 5P;1 and (2) in making applicable to one, the Home Solicitation Sales Act, D.C.Code § 28-3811 (1981). Finding no error, we affirm.
On or about December 8, 1982, petitioner…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ella Tower v. Paralee Moss, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Home Construction Company of Mobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Joseph E. Gerasta, Josefina E. Gerasta, Wife of Joseph E. Gerasta v. Hibernia National Bank v. U. S. Building Materials Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Truitt v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Inez Gallegos v. Mel Stokes, D/B/A Big "A" Auto Parts and Hopper Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beard v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Committee of Blind Vendors of the District of Columbia v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Woodruff v. McConkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Capital Construction Co. v. Plaza West Cooperative Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Saul v. Rowan Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.