Legal Opinion

Kristine Marie Shuey

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 18, 2019No. 10-27054Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: Case No. 10 BK 27054 KRISTINE MARIE SHUEY, Chapter 7 Debtor. Hon. Jack B. Schmetterer MEMORANDUM OPINION ON MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND [DKT. NO. 76] Debtor Kristine Shuey (“Debtor”) now moves to alter or amend the Opinion on Remand [Dkt. No. 73] and Order on Remand [Dkt. No. 75]. For reasons articulated below, Debtor’s Rule 9023 Motion to Alter or Amend Ruling and Order (the “Motion to Alter or Amend”) [Dkt. No. 76] will be DENIED by separate order to be entered concurrently herewith. BACKGROUND A. Case History…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yoshio Oto, of the Estate of Noboru Oto v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendant/third-Party v. Ashby Beverley, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Lionel Bordelon v. Chicago School Reform Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  3. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Richard F. Harrington, Tavares Harrington, Tyjuan Kidd v. City of Chicago, Officer Delgado, Officer MoranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  5. Milton B. Russell v. Delco Remy Division of General Motors Corporation, Saegertown Manufacturing Company and Jordan ChalmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API