Legal Opinion

Green v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 15, 1913No. 2582Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

From a conviction and fine of $25 for abusive language under article 1020, Penal Code, appellant appeals.

The indictment is good under the statute and decisions and form laid down by Judge White, and the court, correctly overruled appellant’s motion to quash it. Foreman v. State, 31 Texas Crim. Rep., 477; Trezevant v. State, 47 Texas Crim. Rep., 502; Menasco v. State, 32 Texas Crim. Rep., 582; Bryson v. State, 39 S. W. Rep., 365; White’s Ann. P. C., sec. 986.

There is a suggestion by the Assistant AttorneyrGeneral that the file mailt on the purported statement of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kingsbury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Foreman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Menasco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  4. Trezevant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API