Crisp v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER RE: GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WANGER, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On December 4, 1996, Plaintiffs Gilbert Mark Crisp and Rhonda Crisp (“the Crisps”) filed a complaint against the government, alleging that the government has no valid lien claims against them based on income tax deficiencies. Now the government moves to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; the Crisps oppose this motion.
II. BACKGROUND
The Crisps timely filed federal income tax returns for the calendar years 1988 and 1989. On April 6, 1995, the Internal Revenue Service…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- William St. Clair John Shelton v. City of Chico County of ButteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- (PS) Bator v. DixonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PS) Ingram v. CrailDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PS) Lull v. County of PlacerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PS) Selck v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- (PS) Selck v. Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.