State ex rel. Nash v. State
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Per curiam
L Granted; relief denied; sentence corrected. The district court erred in granting relator’s motion to correct an illegal sentence by amending his sentence to reflect that it is no longer without parole eligibility and ordering the Louisiana Department of Corrections to revise relator’s prison master accordingly. The court further erred by directing the Department to calculate an eligibility date for parole consideration according to the criteria provided by La.R.S. 15:574.4(A)(2). Although relator seeks review because the district court did not provide him the remedy he sought — resentencing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- State v. TateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2013
- Tate v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Parfait v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2015
- State v. NashLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018