Legal Opinion

Tenderella v. Kaiser Permanente

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 14, 1996No. 9409-06226 CA A87175PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiffs move for reconsideration of our previous decision, in which we affirmed this case without opinion. Tenderella v. Kaiser Permanente, 137 Or App 438, 904 P2d 1094 (1995). We grant the motion in order to respond to their argument on reconsideration and adhere to our previous decision.

Plaintiffs brought a claim for medical malpractice against defendants. The claim was arbitrated pursuant to an agreement between the parties. Under the applicable agreement, each side chose one arbitrator, who together chose the third, neutral arbitrator. After an extensive hearing, the arbitrators…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goeller v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Virginia Beach Board of Realtors, Inc. v. Goodman Segar Hogan, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schmidt v. Pacific Benefit Services, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API