Legal Opinion

Lee v. Simonds

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1854PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action of Right.—Adjourned into Supreme Court from the District Court of Linn. This suit is brought to recover possession of a certain tract of land in Linn County.

Read the full summary

Action of Right.—Adjourned into Supreme Court from the District Court of Linn. This suit is brought to recover possession of a certain tract of land in Linn County. The facts material to a decision of the case are as follows: 'Simonds took the claim in dispute in the fall of 1849; lived .on it the ensuing winter; started for Illinois in the spring of 1850; said he was going after his family; would bring one of his sons if his wife did not come; would return if he lived; left the claim in dispute in possession of Carroll as his agent; small field on east side of it; promised to write Carroll…

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, C. J.

These facts show that Lee took possession of the land in dispute in the fall of 1850; but Simonds says that he was then “residing upon and cultivating” said land, and, therefore, Lee’s possession was wrongful as against him. Was Simonds residing upon and cultivating the land in dispute in the fall of 1850, within the meaning of the donation act ? If he was there, his claim is prior in time and paramount in right to the claim of Lee, but if he was not, then Lee’s possession, commencing in 1850, must be preferred to the possession of Simonds, commencing in 1851. Simonds and his family were in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hancock v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  2. Vincent v. EavesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burnham v. RangeleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1845
  2. State ex rel Kristof v. FaganOregon Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API