Legal Opinion · Dissent

The State Fair of Texas, Cross-Appellee, Steck & Stapf Attractions, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. United States Consumer Product Safety Commission, Cross

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1981No. 80-1006Published

1DissentAinsworth, Circuit Judge

Despite the carefully articulated reasons set forth in the majority opinion which holds that an aerial tramway in an amusement park is within the jurisdiction of the Consumer Product Safety Commission under the Consumer Product Safety Act of 1972, 15 U.S.C. § 2051 et seq. (the Act), I continue to believe that the language of the Act itself, interpreted by taking the words as they are commonly and ordinarily understood, as well as the legislative history, dictate the conclusion that the aerial tramway • is not a consumer product and not under the Act. Consequently, I dissent.

Whether or not the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API