Caulfield v. Curry
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from superior court of Grand Rapids. (Parrish, J.) Bill filed to set aside a mortgage. Defendant Norton B. Holmes appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The defendants Curry and Alvin Holmes, being copartners in the grocery business at Grand Rapids, on the first day of December, 1885, made and filed a chattel mortgage upon their whole stock of goods then on hand, and such additions as might thereafter be added thereto, all fixtures of every kind, all articles in and about their store, and a horse, wagon, and harness. This mortgage was for $750, a portion of the same being admitted to be given for the individual debt of Alvin Holmes, who is the son of Norton B. Holmes, the mortgagee named in said instrument, and to whom it was delivered.
Decembe…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Huron Waterworks Co. v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
- Dalton v. StilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Niles v. United States Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1903