Legal Opinion

United States v. Ebanks

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided December 4, 1989No. ACM 27797PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEONARD, Judge:

Appellant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of three offenses of willful disobedience of a “safe sex” order of his commander. On appeal, he asserts that the military judge erred by failing to direct one-for-one confinement credit for his pretrial confinement. Additionally, in a submission pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A.1982), appellant maintains that he did not freely enter into the pretrial agreement in his case and his guilty plea was improvident because the “safe sex” order was an unlawful order. On the issue of unlawfulness of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. WomackUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  3. United States v. WomackU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988
  4. United States v. DumfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. OliverUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  2. United States v. CrawfordU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API