Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Park

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 26, 1973No. 5-6224PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Appellant sought judgment on the basis of its ownership of a promissory note purportedly executed by appellee. The trial court, sitting as a jury, held that appellant failed to meet its burden of proof that appellee did in fact sign the note. We shall refer to appellant as U.S.F.& G. and to appellee as Park.

On March 7, 1960, Park purchased from Kern-Limerick, Inc., a large crawler tractor for $14,557.92. U.S.F.&G. contends that Park executed a promissory note for part of the down payment, which note was negotiated to First National Bank of Little Rock; that after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Home Indemnity Co. of N.Y. v. JelksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gruzen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Timmerman Leasing, Inc. v. ChristiansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. LacySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Gruzen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API