Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 1977No. 136PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’BRIEN, Justice.

On November 4, 1975, appellee, Harry E. Tucker, defeated appellant, Lee A. Lehman, the incumbent, for the office of Sheriff of Forest County. On January 16, 1976, appellant Lehman filed an action in quo warranto, challenging the right of appellee Tucker to hold the office of sheriff.

The gravamen of appellant’s complaint was that appellee did not meet the residency requirements for county officers as set forth in the County Code, 1 and, therefore, appellant, as the incumbent, pursuant to Article 9, § 4, of the Pennsylvania Constitution, would remain in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Broom v. HanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1848
  2. Dorris v. Lloyd (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Commonwealth v. WiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leedom v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Judicial Conduct Board v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. COM. EX REL. JUD. CONDUCT BD. v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Leedom v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API