Legal Opinion

Wilson Company v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 7, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J..

Appellee recovered a judgment, which is not complained of as being excessive if there is liability, to compensate his injury alleged to have been sustained while using concentrated lye in washing windows for appellant. This appeal is prosecuted to reverse the judgment, and it is insisted, for the reversal thereof, that no liability was shown, and that error was committed in giving certain instructions.

Appellee testified that he and three other colored men and a boy worked two days for appellant scrubbing floors with hot water and lye, that the three other men were then discharged,…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaver v. Parsons Feed & Farm Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API