Legal Opinion
State v. Maisto
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 15, 1983No. 82-2539PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
427 So.2d 1120 (1983)
The STATE of Florida, Petitioner,
v.
Vincent F. MAISTO, Respondent.
No. 82-2539.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
March 15, 1983.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Penny Hershoff Brill, Asst. Atty. Gen., for petitioner.
Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross and Geoffrey C. Fleck, Miami, for respondent.
Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.
FERGUSON, Judge.
Petitioner, State of Florida, brings on for review by Writ of Certiorari[1] a trial court decision which grants the respondent's motion in limine and prohibits petitioner from introducing similar fact evidence…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sias v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- State v. SteinbrecherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PettisSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- State v. SavinoSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Huggins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- State v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.