Legal Opinion
Bayonne v. Passaic Consolidated Water Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided October 5, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In 1894 a firm contracted to supply the city of Bayonne with water for use by its inhabitants over a term of years, renewable for additional terms at the option of the complainant. The contract has been renewed, until now, if it is in force at all it will not expire before 1929, for one purpose, 1944 for another, and not then, the complainant maintains, if it elects to continue it in conformity with its provisions. This contract with the complainant was assigned by the above-mentioned firm in 1895 to the New York and New Jersey Water Company, and, subsequently, all the rights of the New York…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska Ex Rel. OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
3Cited by4 opinions
- Morris v. GlaserNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Feldman v. Urban Commercial, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. Passaic Valley Water CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Schmoele v. Atlantic City Railroad Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931