Legal Opinion

People v. Nesci

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided July 7, 1998Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Appeal unanimously dismissed.

*686An order determining a motion to quash a subpoena issued in the course of the prosecution of a criminal action arises out of a criminal proceeding for which no direct appellate review is authorized (People v Santos, 64 NY2d 702). This rule, however, applies only to the parties to the underlying criminal action. A nonparty to the action may take an appeal since the order is final as to that individual or entity (see, Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena No. 2573/85, 111 AD2d 891, lv denied 65 NY2d 606; People v Johnson, 103 AD2d 754).

In the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. SantosNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Hongisto v. MercureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. In re Grand Jury Subpoena No. 2573/85Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API