Master Spark Co. v. Hickerson
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Marschner (Adolph F.) J, Assumpsit by the Master Spark Company against Benjamin F. Hickerson for money had and received. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Mr. D. M. Sweeney, of San Francisco, patented an automobile accessory which, for a time, found some favor in the automobile world. He named it the “Master Spark,” and proceeded to manufacture and place it upon the market. It came to the attention of defendant, who was engaged in selling such articles, and he later made an arrangement with Mr. Sweeney, or his associates, to sell it on commission. In June, 1916, while these relations existed, a corporation with a capital of $2,500 was organized in the city of Chicago, and defendant was named president and sales manager. Mr. Sweeney was named…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rose v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Cilley v. Van PattenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Peirce v. ClosterhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Ganther v. James Jenks & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Gates v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.