Commonwealth v. Budd Realty Corp.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Richards, specially presiding in the court below.
One matter inferentially passed upon by him requires some comment from us. It is argued by appellant that the Attorney General is not entitled to his commission. We cannot support this view, because of the language of Section 1408 of the Act of April 9, 1929, P. L. 343, as amended, 72 PS Sec. 1408, which states that, in tax and other claims, if the debtor admits that part of the claim is due and if the part admitted to be due be paid to the Department of Revenue within twenty-one days…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Bayuk Cigars, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Olsen v. GeeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1962
- Carlisle Deposit Bank & Trust Co. v. Cumberland County Commissioners, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1943
- Copenhaver v. Markle-Bullers Coal Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1978
- Kritz EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1956