Legal Opinion

Saunderson v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1898No. 18,713PublishedCited by 2 opinions

From the Benton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

The appellants, who are attorneys of the bar of the Benton Circuit Court, were fined for an *551alleged indirect contempt of court, in having adopted, at a bar meeting held for that purpose, certain resolutions in relation to the procedure and practice in said court, and in causing such resolutions to be published by sending copies thereof to certain attorneys in other counties of the 30th judicial circuit, of which circuit Benton county forms a part. The proper procedure for bringing before the court persons charged with indirect contempt is found set out in section 1024, Burns’ E. S. 1894…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State v. BuntinIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Strange v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LandryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. State v. ShumakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API