Drake v. Andrews
Michigan Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from tho Oakland Circuit Court, in Chancery, because the same was not taken within the forty days prescribed by statute.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Wing, J.
The decree in the Court of Chancery, dismissing the hill in this case, was entered on the eleventh day of December, eighteen hundred and. *204forty-nine. The appeal was taken on the twenty-first day of January, eighteen hundred and and fifty.
The 143d section of chapter 90, page 312 of the Revised Statutes of 1846, provides, that “any complainant or defendant who may think himself aggrieved by the decree or order of a Circuit Court in Chancery, may appeal therefrom to the Supreme Court.” By section 144, it is required that “such appeal shall be claimed and entered within…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Alderman v.PhelpsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1818
3Cited by10 opinions
- Simmons v. HanneSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Meyer v. Hot Springs Imp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- State Tax-Law CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Vohlers v. E. H. Stafford Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.