Hoag v. Boyle
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This action involves the question whether an oral promise to pay certain obligations was original and primary in character or was a mere collateral promise to pay the debt of another and therefore within the statute of frauds.
It was alleged and shown that H. W. Eastman and F. E. Clark were partners carrying on an oil business under the name of the Southwest Oil Company; that they had borrowed from William F. Hoag, $644.55, giving their note which bore interest at the rate of eight per cent per annum. On the back of the note was the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Johnson v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Ezell v. ButcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- First National Bank v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Longton State Bank v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Higgin Manufacturing Co. v. Bankers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Walton v. Piqua State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970