Legal Opinion

State v. Quick

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 31, 1991No. 2 CA-CR 89-0271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROLL, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Bruce Gerald Quick appeals from his conviction for producing marijuana in the Tonto National Forest. For the reasons set forth below, we vacate the plea agreement and remand for reinstatement of charges.

FACTS

The grand jury transcript and the change of plea proceedings indicate that the defendant grew marijuana in the Tonto National Forest in Gila County, Arizona. The defendant produced 204 marijuana plants, three to four feet tall, having a wet weight of 74.5 pounds.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The defendant was indicted for possession of marijuana for sale,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. County of FresnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. State v. LimpusCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. State v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. State v. McVayArizona Supreme Court · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SZPYRKACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Wagner v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State of Arizona v. Steven D. SzpyrkaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
  5. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API