Legal Opinion
Batchelor v. Newness
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 11, 1945No. 30098PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
We are of the opinion that in order to reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals it would be necessary to read out of that part of rule 19 in question here the words “during his period of service.” The questioned paragraph would then read:
“In computing the years of service, any member of the police department who has actively served in the armed forces of the United States in time of warfare or when armed expeditions were conducted, and such member has been honorably discharged, a credit for such war service shall be allowed to such member, but such credit shall not in any case…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Martin v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
- Salz v. State House CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Salz v. State House CommissionNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- State ex rel. Bailey v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. Meechan, Unpublished Decision (7-28-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.