Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. 1263523 Ontario, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 31, 2002No. 99 Civ.8670(LTS)(MHD)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SWAIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), in this action brought pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 19(a) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 57b, charges defendants 1263523 Ontario, Inc. d/b/a Consumer Credit Services (“Consumer Credit”), an Ontario corporation, Donald M. Davies, Lloyd Charles Prudenza, and David Seymour Wells (“Defendants”) with violations of Section 5 of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. Section 45, and the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”), 16 C.F.R. Part 310.1 et seq., promulgated pursuant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Henderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Au Bon Pain Corporation v. Artect, Inc., Douglas Kahn and Max GordonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Allee v. MedranoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert J. McNulty George G. Handgis, Franklin D. Roberts, John M. Shanklin and W.N. Thompson, John M. ShanklinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,803 Steven Flaks v. David I. Koegel and Flora Mir Candy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Capitol Records v. Rita CarmichaelDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Bildstein v. Mastercard International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Virgin Records America, Inc. v. LaceyDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Atlantic Recording Corp. v. CarterDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2007
- Rubin v. Mastercard International, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.