Williamson v. Southern Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
While it is a well-recognized rule in this State that “a railroad company is not required to fence in or place guards along its road where there may be cuts or embankments, notwithstanding a public road may run parallel to such railroad” (King v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 107 Ga. 754, 758, 33 S. E. 839; Autry v. Southern Ry. Co., 32 Ga. App. 8, 123 S. E. 752), and while it has been recently held by this court that “the owner of land traversed by a public highway is under no duty to a traveler along the highway to maintain in a safe condition for travel the abutting premises at a point such a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- King v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Poole v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Autry v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fuller v. Louis Steyerman & Sons Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Greenfield v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Gray v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Poe v. IMC PHOSPHATES MP, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.