Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 28, 1930No. 20099PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

While it is a well-recognized rule in this State that “a railroad company is not required to fence in or place guards along its road where there may be cuts or embankments, notwithstanding a public road may run parallel to such railroad” (King v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 107 Ga. 754, 758, 33 S. E. 839; Autry v. Southern Ry. Co., 32 Ga. App. 8, 123 S. E. 752), and while it has been recently held by this court that “the owner of land traversed by a public highway is under no duty to a traveler along the highway to maintain in a safe condition for travel the abutting premises at a point such a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Poole v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Autry v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Louis Steyerman & Sons Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Greenfield v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Gray v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. Poe v. IMC PHOSPHATES MP, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API