Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority & Computer Sciences Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: On a prior appeal, we remitted this matter to Supreme Court for resolution of factual issues concerning the contractor’s compliance with contractual notice and claim requirements that constituted condition precedents to arbitration (see, Matter of Niagara Frontier Transp. Auth. v Computer Sciences Corp., 179 AD2d 1037). After a lengthy hearing, the Judicial Hearing Officer concluded that the contractor substantially complied with the contractual notice and claim requirements, and that, by reason of the voluminous correspondence,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Buckley & Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Joseph F. Egan, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Whitmyer Bros., Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Huff Enterprises, Inc. v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- G. De Vincentis & Son Construction, Inc. v. City of OneontaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- C & L Elec., Inc. v. City Univ. of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Old Colony Construction, LLC v. SouthingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015