Legal Opinion

Wisneiwski v. Starr

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 2, 1980No. 79-645PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant appeals from the trial Court's granting of a mandatory injunction, finding Appellant to be in violation of a restrictive covenant contained in a deed. We affirm.

In 1973, Plaintiff-Appellee Thomas A. Mattox made plans for the subdivision of a tract of land owned by him and his wife in Calhoun County, Alabama. The deeds to each individual lot, conveyed pursuant to that plan, contained the following restrictive covenant:

"Use of said parcel is restricted to residential purposes and there can be placed on said parcel of land no more than one residence or one mobile home. . . ." (Emphasis…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reetz v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Laney v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  3. Centers, Inc. v. GillilandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hines v. HeislerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  2. Turner v. CluttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Diercks v. Odom (Ex parte Odom)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Orange Beach Marina, Inc. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. RIVERCHASE HOMEOWNERS PROTECTIVE ASS'N, INC. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API