Wisneiwski v. Starr
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Appellant appeals from the trial Court's granting of a mandatory injunction, finding Appellant to be in violation of a restrictive covenant contained in a deed. We affirm.
In 1973, Plaintiff-Appellee Thomas A. Mattox made plans for the subdivision of a tract of land owned by him and his wife in Calhoun County, Alabama. The deeds to each individual lot, conveyed pursuant to that plan, contained the following restrictive covenant:
"Use of said parcel is restricted to residential purposes and there can be placed on said parcel of land no more than one residence or one mobile home. . . ." (Emphasis…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reetz v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Laney v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
- Centers, Inc. v. GillilandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hines v. HeislerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Turner v. CluttsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Diercks v. Odom (Ex parte Odom)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
- Orange Beach Marina, Inc. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- RIVERCHASE HOMEOWNERS PROTECTIVE ASS'N, INC. v. City of HooverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.