Legal Opinion
Hicks v. Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1986No. Nos. 85-1085, 85-1086PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Senior Circuit Judge:
Soon after this court affirmed the grant of summary judgment in favor of all of the *1166defendants, Hicks v. Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency, 737 F.2d 399 (4th Cir.1984), the defendants, Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency and Sherwood, filed a motion in the district court for the allowance of attorneys’ fees and costs jointly against the two plaintiffs and their lawyers. The district court granted the motion, and the plaintiffs and their lawyers have appealed.
We affirm.
I
Each of the plaintiffs was discharged by Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Overnite Transportation Co. v. Chicago Industrial Tire Co., Appeal of Themis N. Anastos and Paul E. PeldyakCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Gordon v. HeimannCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Watkins v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Hicks v. Southern Maryland Health Systems AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hutchinson v. StatonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Kunstler.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Eleven Vehicles, Their Equipment and AccessoriesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Morley v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Montgomery v. Jimmy's Tire & Auto Center, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.