Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Wilcox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Paternity must be established by evidence that is "clear, convincing and entirely satisfactory”, something more than a mere •preponderance of the evidence (Matter of Piccola v Hibbard, 51 AD2d 674; Matter of Hawthorne v De Both 42 AD2d 827). In the case of a child born to a married woman, the law presumes the child is legitimate and petitioner must prove nonaccess by the husband during the period of conception (Matter of Hawthorne v De Both, supra; Matter of Gray v Rose 30 AD2d 138). The evidence in the present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Piccola v. HibbardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Gray v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. Hawthorne v. De BothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raysor v. GabbeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Czajak v. VavoneseNew York City Family Court · 1980
  3. Erie County Department of Social Services v. AbdallahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Hemingway v. OtvosNew York City Family Court · 1983
  5. Palmer v. CarterNew York City Family Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API