Legal Opinion
The Florida Bar v. Newhouse
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 11, 1986No. 66642PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
498 So.2d 935 (1986)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Richard G. NEWHOUSE, Respondent.
No. 66642.
Supreme Court of Florida.
December 11, 1986.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee; and Jacquelyn Plasner Needelman, Bar Counsel, Fort Lauderdale, for complainant.
Richard G. Newhouse, Ft. Lauderdale, in Pro Per.
2Per curiam
The Florida Bar filed a five-count complaint against Richard G. Newhouse, a member of the bar. After a hearing, the referee recommended that Newhouse be found guilty of violating disciplinary rules 1-102(A)(1) (violation of a disciplinary rule),…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence.
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Marks v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Velsor v. Allstate Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- National Indem. Co. v. AndrewsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Sentinel Star Co. v. EdwardsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Kirkland v. RobbinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Rapp v. Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme CourtDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
- Sentinel Communications Co. v. WatsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. CabreraSuperior Court of Delaware · 2008
- Florida Bar v. NewhouseSupreme Court of Florida · 1989