Legal Opinion

State v. Bragg

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 29, 1951No. 4 Div. 180Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing

In our original opinion we stated: “He (Dr. Bragg) had substantial interests in an insurance business and a real estate agency in Elba, Alabama.”

In brief on application for rehearing the accuracy of this statement is questioned. Counsel states: “ * * * there is not one word of testimony in the whole record that Dr. Bragg owned a real estate agency in Elba, Alabama, or that he was a stockholder in a real estate agency in Elba, Alabama.”

We found authority for our assertion in brief of appellant's counsel. The correctness of the statement in brief was not denied or controverted by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BraggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API