Legal Opinion

Petty v. Equitable Prod., Unpublished Decision (2-24-2006)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 24, 2006No. 05 MA 80UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Dale and Mary Petty appeal the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court, which entered judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Anderson and Loretta McGee. The issue is whether the McGees improperly interfered with the Pettys' right to receive free gas when the McGees disconnected a line at a gas well on their property that led to the Pettys' property. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

{¶ 2} In December 1971, Raymond, Agnes and Harlin Shook entered a Lease Agreement with a gas company. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Sethi v. AntonucciOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Eiselstein v. BaluckOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Walters v. GoddardOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Colbur Tech, L.L.C. v. Zerco Sys. Internatl., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Moore v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Coman v. ComanOhio Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API