Petty v. Equitable Prod., Unpublished Decision (2-24-2006)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Dale and Mary Petty appeal the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court, which entered judgment in favor of defendants-appellees Anderson and Loretta McGee. The issue is whether the McGees improperly interfered with the Pettys' right to receive free gas when the McGees disconnected a line at a gas well on their property that led to the Pettys' property. For the following reasons, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
{¶ 2} In December 1971, Raymond, Agnes and Harlin Shook entered a Lease Agreement with a gas company. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stapleton v. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Sethi v. AntonucciOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eiselstein v. BaluckOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Walters v. GoddardOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Colbur Tech, L.L.C. v. Zerco Sys. Internatl., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Moore v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Coman v. ComanOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.