Legal Opinion · Dissent

Matturri v. Board of Trustees of the Judicial Retirement System

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 24, 2002Published

1DissentColeman, J.

I disagree with the Court’s holding that although the State House Commission took no “action in respect of the ALJ’s Initial Decision until the forty-five day period” mandated by N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10c had expired, the decision should not be deemed adopted pursuant to that statutory provision. Ante at 380, 802 A.2d at 503. There is neither statutory nor decisional law to support that holding. The statute contains no exception to its forty-five day requirement. King v. New Jersey Racing Commission, relied on by the Court, provides that the ALJ’s decision should be deemed approved where the agency…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Alan J. Cornblatt, PA v. BarowSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. G.S. v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Kozak v. RETIREMENT BOARD OF FIREMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUNDIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State, Tp. of Pennsauken v. SchadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API