Legal Opinion

New York County Lawyers' Ass'n v. Bloomberg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 2012PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Ciparick, J.

This appeal presents the question of whether the City of New York’s 2010 plan for indigent defense, permitting representation by both institutional providers and private attorneys in cases in which a conflict of interest precludes representation by the initial provider, constitutes a valid combination plan within the meaning of article 18-B of the County Law (County Law § 722). Petitioners, various county bar associations, challenged the proposed plan and its implementing regulations (see 43 RCNY 13-01 et seq.) as violative of County Law § 722 and Municipal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wood v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. In re M.B. Mental Hygiene Legal ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Matter of Anonymous v. MolikNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Matter of Edna Shannon v. Westchester County Department of Social ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. The Matter of Senator Tony Avella v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Town of Aurora v. Village of E. AuroraNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. People v. AddimandoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API