Harbor Associates, Inc. v. Asheroff
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Liff, J.
Upon the foregoing papers it is ordered that this motion by defendant Asheroff (the action was discontinued as against the other defendants) for an order recalling the court’s decision of June 25,1968, requesting the court to pass on findings of fact, or in the alternative for a new trial, is denied.
In its decision the court stated the facts which it deemed essential to its determination (CPLR 4213, subd. [b]) and the conclusions of law at which it had arrived. There is no requirement under the present statute (CPLR 4213, subd. [a]) that the court make findings of fact. "While subdivision (a)…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Penzell v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1983
- Gould v. PollackCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971