Legal Opinion

State v. Tullos

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 8, 1914No. 20622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

-Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T. F. Bell, Judge. W. Y. Tullos was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

Defendant, a druggist, was convicted of retailing intoxicating liquors, to wit, one pint of alcohol, without previously obtaining a license from the police jury of the parish of Caddo, or the municipal authorities of any city or town therein.

Defendant was found guilty as charged, and was fined in the sum of $301, and in default of payment of the fine to serve 30 days on the public roads. Defendant has appealed.

It appears from several bills of exception that the defendant, a regular druggist, employing a regular licensed pharmacist, sold a pint of alcohol to a person who stated that *642he wished…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  2. State v. BoulangerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. State v. MarounSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  2. State v. LawsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  3. State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API