Legal Opinion

Harry Mottsman & Co. v. State Liquor Authority

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

Section 1286 of the Civil Practice Act requires a proceeding of this character to be brought within four months after the determination to be reviewed becomes final and binding upon the petitioner. (See Matter of Nachbar v. Bruchman, 249 App. Div. 723; leave to appeal denied, Id. 814.) On September 21, 1939, the respondents rendered a decision ordering the cancellation of petitioner’s license. That decision has never been withdrawn or modified by the respondents. The present proceeding was not commenced until March 1, 1940, more than four months after the order canceling the petitioner’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nachbar v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mallen v. MortonNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Francisco v. O'ConnellNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Nelson v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Cosmopolitan Catering Corp. v. HostetterNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Green v. Civil Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API